Skip to main content

Popularity of sports.

The most popular sport in the world is undoubtedly football/soccer, which is why FIFA has more members than the United Nations. The second biggest sport in the world, due to it's large following in India, is cricket. But looking at registered players' numbers that I got from various sources including Wikipedia & the FIBA website , I find that volleyball is the most participated in/played sport in the word with around 998 million registered players & badminton has 200 million. To me, this means the average volleyball player would need to be around five times better at their sport than an average badminton player at badminton to reach similar amounts of success. 


The Top 5 list:
  • 1) 998 million - Volleyball
  • 2) 400 million - Basketball
  • 3) 300 million - Table Tennis
  • 4) 242 million - Soccer
  • 5) 200 million - Badminton 

In South Africa, we live under the illusion that the national rugby team is more successful than the national football team. This is obviously an unfair comparison because football is probably much more competitive globally & has more registered players while rugby is not even in the top ten most participated in sports by number of registered players. How much more competitive is football compared to rugby? Rugby is said to have a 6,6 million registered players while soccer has over 240 million (240 m ÷ 6,6 m = 36.36364). The maths says that the average footballer needs to be 36 times better at their sport to achieve the same kind of success as the average rugby player. Remember this, there are 32 teams in the FIFA World Cup, which means by simply qualifying for it is more than the equivalent of winning the Webb Ellis Trophy of the IRB Rugby World Cup. Bafana Bafana have qualified TWICE for the FIFA World Cup, in 1998 & 2002. Among other achievements is Bafana Bafana winning the African Cup of Nations in 1996, beating World Champions on two or three occasions. This should more than count considering that you need to be approximately 36 times better as a player in football to be a professional than the average rugby player would need to be good at rugby. Adding the fact that there are only twenty participants in the IRB Rugby World Cup simply seals the deal. By comparison, Bafana Bafana would be FIVE-TIME World Champions in the rugby world. We must think about this next time we compare our national sports teams.

Popular posts from this blog

Why "KwaTu"?

We are all "Tu": In many, if not, most of the major indigenous languages in Africa, there's the "tu" suffix or "tu" in the body of the word meaning "a person" (NB: It can be spelt differently depending on accents, in some African languages it's "-du" & others "-tho".).  " Tu " may be the best name for Africa collectively.  Hausa: Person ~ Mu tu m Igbo: People ~ Ndị mma dụ Swahili: Person or people ~ M tu au wa tu   Maybe Tu is too short a word to call a continent so we add the place name prefix "kwa" (meaning at/for) present in Swahili, Kinyarwanda, Zulu & other African languages to make Kwatu or KwaTu .

History of the Mpofana by Mthoko M. Mpofana

I'm not very traditional, I'm more straightforward & basic & often disregard cultural nuances so this history of the Mpofana tribe is going to be as direct & concise as possible.  Growing up, I grew up knowing that the clan praises or izithakazelo of the Mpofana are "Zulu" & "Ntombela", I never questioned that.  What I know now for sure is that there's a lot more that's hidden in history. What I keep seeing being repeated from various sources is that the Mpofana were part of the Amazizi (or AmaTiti) tribe. I now know that in the midlands & perhaps further north, up to the northwestern parts of KZN, they use the greeting "MaZizi okuhlala", perhaps alluding to the fact that the Mpofana as well as other Amazizi tribes were among the original tribes to settle in present-day KZN from 200 AD onwards & the "Dlamini" praise or greeting was used among all Dlamini tribes i. e. the Amahlubi, Amazizi (Mtiti), Hlangwini...

The modern Zulu language.

I always wondered which of the many Zulu dialects modern Zulu is & always thought it was Hlubi (isiMbo) & according to this thesis by a Mr. Isaac Sibusiso Kubeka written in what was apparently 1979, we see modern Zulu is more the original Ntungwa dialect. The Mthethwa dialect (isiLala) that was likely spoken by King Shaka looks more a Tsonga dialect from a Zulu-speaker's perspective. Despite the "Zulu area" speaking many dialects, I'm of the belief that these dialects were mutually intelligible & similar for the most part. This is the only way these Nguni tribes from southern Mozambique up to Umzimvubu River & inland into the Drakensberg Mountains up to Gauteng could understand each other because I, genuinely, think that it was seldom that an African travelled to a land where he couldn't speak the local language in precolonial times.  Mild differences between Zulu dialects. Writing Zulu   I remember reading a book written in 1930 by ...